No. 109.
Mr. Williamson to Mr. Fish.
United
States Legation in Central America,
Comayagua. Honduras, March
23, 1875. (Received April 27.)
No. 322.]
Sir: I have the honor to hand you herewith an
English and Spanish copy of the protocol signed by the minister of foreign
affairs of Honduras and ‘myself yesterday, in regard to the settlement of
the question of the outrage upon our consulate at Omoa, in July, 1873; two
notes and translations addressed to me by the minister, a copy and
translation of the decree accompanying one of the notes, and a copy of my
reply of this date.
I beg to call your attention especially to my reply, as it contains, in
[Page 158]
as diplomatic language as I was
able to employ, my views upon the presentation of the constitutional and
legal argument of the minister.
The government of Honduras professed to be anxious to comply with the demand
as originally presented, and, as I understood, agreed on in February, 1874,
and, I believe, if it had dared to do so, would have pledged itself to begin
proceedings against the officer in command at Omoa at the time of the
outrage. The real difficulty, in my judgment, was not on account of
constitutional or legal restrictions; for Central American history testifies
that they are not usually regarded when the executive has the power and will
to override them. It was substantially based on the following facts:
* * * * * * *
3d. Fear of the party of Arias, of which Straeber (the offending official)
was the military chief, and of which he is now one of the most active and
unscrupulous members.
My reasons for not pressing that part of the demand at this time, but, as you
will see by Article Y of the protocol, leaving it for you to decide whether
it should be pressed hereafter, were mainly as follows:
1st. Because in such a country as this, where there is no sound public
opinion, and no punishment of crime, it would have probably elevated the
fellow who was to be degraded.
* * * * * * *
When the demand was first made in February, 1874, General Straeber, as he is
called, was so infamous that I had reason to believe a compliance with the
demand would have been hailed with apparent satisfaction, even by his own
party. Now there is a great change, and I think such an occasion would be
eagerly seized upon to make Straeber a hero, and to overthrow the present
government of Leiva. I beg leave also to, remark that I am informed, both by
President L3iva and Minister Zuniga, as well as others, that Straeber
neither is now, nor has he ever been, a general of Honduras. They say he was
appointed to that rank by Provisional President Arias, but has never been
confirmed by the Congress. I am also told he is a German by birth, and as an
apothecary shop-boy until he undertook to play the role of a military
chieftain. From all I can learn, he may be justly classed among those
mischievous adventurers who find this country a fitting field for the
exercise of their little talents and the display of their vicious
pretensions.
The salute was fired in the Plaza of Comayagua, on the morning of the 22d
instant, in accordance with the terms of the protocol, in the presence of
the troops, the minister of foreign affairs and of war, myself, and
spectators. I insisted upon the minister proposing to fire the salute in the
plaza of the capital, among other reasons, because it would give the
greatest publicity. Such an event is said never to have occurred before in
the history of Honduras.
One incident in connection with the firing of the salute and the arrangement
of the flag I beg leave to mention. At the request of the President the flag
of Honduras was dragged up after the American flag. I consented to what I
considered this self-imposed degradation of their flag upon the conditions
that the American flag was to be first hoisted and saluted before the flag
of Honduras was unfurled, and that the flag of Honduras should be hauled
down and the American flag alone left flying at the conclusion of the
salute. This was done in accordance with the conditions, and I took occasion
to say publicly that my Government was in no way responsible for such
extraordinary treatment of the flag of Honduras. What was meant by the
President’s request and submission to such conditions I am wholly unable to
comprehend. Immediately
[Page 159]
after the
salute was fired I called upon the President and exchanged congratulations
with him. He and his minister accompanied me to my rooms and staid an hour
or so with me.
I trust the protocol may receive your approbation, and also that our
Government may come to the conclusion that it can, with honor, allow the
whole question to be considered as definitively settled. This country is in
such an unhappy state that it is helpless, and (I fear) on the eve of
anarchy. The government cannot obtain sufficient funds to pay its soldiers
and employés. It cannot enforce authority. Peculations of public moneys at
the ports of entry are openly admitted and permitted, because the President
says he cannot put in better men.
There is no agriculture, no mining industry, no source of present wealth, and
such complete disorganization of society that even a revolution might be a
beneficial change. Honduras is surely in a pitiable plight.
In regard to the decree of amnesty, a copy of which is herewith sent, I beg
leave to say that, while it is questionable whether it is applicable to the
case of Straeber, it is certainly an evidence that the present government of
Honduras has acted with that kind of faith which has so long been considered
an element of Central American diplomacy. No mention of its existence was
made until after the protocol had been signed; and, I have good reason to
believe, it was passed after the receipt by the President and by Mr. Zuniga
of my personal notes to them of January, in which I told them of my intended
visit to Comayagua in February, and recalled to their minds the terms agreed
upon in February, 1874.
Hoping my whole course in this matter may meet your approval, I have,
&c.,
[Inclosure 1 in No. 322.]
Protocol of an interview between his excellency
Adolfo Zuniga, minister of foreign affairs of Honduras, representing
his government, and his excellency George Williamson, minister
resident of the United States of America to the states of Central
America, representing his Government, in relation to the settlement
of the question that has arisen between said governments on account
of the outrage perpetrated upon the consulate of the United States
at Omoa on or about the 9th day of July, A. D. 1873, (eighteen hundred and seventy-three,) by the troops or people of Omoa.
- I.
- His excellency Mr. Williamson stated that, under instructions from
his Government, he renewed the demand for satisfaction for the
outrage upon the consulate of the United States at Omoa, on or about
the 9th day of July, 1873, and hoped, from what was said in his
conversation with the President and the minister of foreign affairs
yesterday, that a satisfactory solution might be reached, honorable
to both his Government and that of Honduras.
- II.
- The minister of the United States stated the demand for
satisfaction was as follows:
- 1st.
- That a letter of ample apology should be written to him,
representing his Government, by the government of
Honduras.
- 2d.
- That a salute of twenty-one guns should be fired to the
American flag, at a time and place to be designated.
- III.
- That the officer in command of Omoa and the fortress and troops of
Honduras at that place at the time the said outrage was committed,
should be dismissed from his rank, and by law be forever prohibited
from holding any office of honor, trust, or profit, civil or
military, under the government of Honduras. The minister of the
United States also stated, if constitutional or legal obstacles
existed that might prevent or hinder a compliance with the third
article of the demand for satisfaction, that they would be
considered.
His excellency Mr Zuniga, minister of foreign affairs, replied:
- I.
- That on the 19th of February, 1874, the government of Honduras
answered the claim of his excellency Mr. Williamson, United
States minister, signifying that the
[Page 160]
Honduras government deplored this
disagreeable incident, offering to send to Omoa and to get the
necessary information to verify the acts which gave cause to the
claim; and that in case it was found true, the Honduras
government would feel pleasure in doing justice to the
Government of the United. States, as established by the laws of
nations. To that effect a double information was taken by the
civil and military judges of first instance at Omoa. Although
from these informations it does not appear especially proven the
entire act or outrage offered to the American consulate, which
had to suffer from the forces stationed at Omoa, together with
all the commercial houses, native and foreign, at that place,
still the government has the moral conviction of the reality of
the outrage, and for this reason the secretary of foreign
affairs, in a dispatch of the 24th of November, in reply to the
second claim of his excellency Mr. Williamson, United States
minister, dated the 10th of October, stated that the government
of Honduras was disposed to give the satisfaction demanded, and
by word agreed in a conversation which took place in this
capital with the President of the republic, his excellency Mr.
Williamson, and the cabinet ministers; that is to say, salute
the American flag.
- II.
- That, in reference to the letter of satisfaction to be
addressed to the minister of the United States, the Honduras
government has already expressed on distinct occasions the
entire disapprobation and the profound sorrow for the conduct
observed by the expeditionary forces at Omoa. That in the
dispatches of the 24th November and 19th February, 1874, it has
been so explained to his excellency Mr. Williamson, United
States minister, but there is no difficulty in addressing
another dispatch to the minister of the United States, repeating
that the government of Honduras deplores and condemns the
outrage committed on the American consulate at Omoa.
- III.
- That regarding the destitution of employment and military rank
of the officer who commanded the forces of Honduras at Omoa, and
to his inability to hold any office of honor, of confidence, or
of profit under the government of Honduras, the government meets
with constitutional inconveniences to accede to this part of the
demand of the United States minister. The destitution or the
privation of an occupation or title, whether civil or military,
and the inability, temporal or absolute, to hold an appointment
of honor, lucrative or of confidence, is a penalty that can only
be imposed by the tribunals by law established, giving cause,
and in virtue of a sentence pronounced. That these
summarily-expressed reasons will be explained in exienso to the United States minister in the
dispatch which has been alluded to.
- IV.
- That the government of Honduras, in satisfaction to the
Government of the United States for the outrage committed on the
American consul at Omoa, will order a salute to be given to the
flag of the United States in this capital, at 8 o’clock on the
morning of the 23d instant, expressing the hope that the
Government of the United States will find itself satisfied, and
so conclude and terminate this disagreeable incident.
- V.
- The minister of the United States, after some discussion of
the constitution and laws of Honduras, referred to by the
minister of foreign affairs, stated that, on behalf of his
Government, he was willing to accept the letter of apology and
the salute to the flag of the United States, proposed to be made
by the minister of Honduras, on Tuesday, the 23d instant, at 8
o’clock, in the plaza of the capital, Comayagua, in presence of
the undersigned; and also the letter, expressing in details the
constitutional and legal reasons why the third demand, relating
particularly to the punishment of the officer in command at Omoa
at the time the outrage was committed; with the understanding
that, if said letter of explanation is satisfactory to the
Government of the United States, that part of the demand will be
considered as not having been made; and with the further
understanding that, if the said letter of explanation is not
satisfactory to the Government of the United States, then the
government of Honduras pledges itself to exercise all of its
influence and authority to have said part of said demand for
satisfaction complied with as fully as possible, or to give such
other satisfaction as the Government of the United States may,
according to the laws of nations, demand, in lieu of the said
punishment of the said officer who was in command at Omoa at the
time of the outrage.
- VI.
- His excellency Senor Zuniga, minister of foreign affairs of
Honduras, replied: That he accepts the foregoing proposal of his
excellency Mr. Williamson, minister of the United States,
renewing his hope that the Government of the United States will
feel satisfied, and so remains, concluded and terminated, this
disagreeable incident.
In testimony whereof the said minister,
George Williamson, minister resident of the United States, and
Minister Adolfo Zuniga, minister of foreign affairs of Honduras,
have on this day signed this protocol, in duplicate, and alternated,
in the city of Comayagua, Honduras, on this
the twenty-second
day of March, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred
and seventy-five, and have attached thereto the seals of
their respective offices.
[
seal.]
GEO. WILLIAMSON,
Minister
of the United States to the Central American
States.
[
seal.]
ADOLFO ZUNIGA,
Minister of Foreign
Affairs of Honduras.
[Page 161]
[Inclosure 2 in No.
322.—Translation.]
Mr. Zuniga to Mr.
Williamson
Comayagua, March 22,
1875.
Sir: The undersigned, secretary of state and
minister of foreign affairs of the government of Honduras, has the honor
to direct himself, in compliance with what was considered and agreed
upon in the protocol signed this day, to his excellency Mr. George
Williamson, minister resident of the United States, reiterating to him
that the government of Honduras deplores and condemns the outrage
committed on the American consulate at Omoa on or about the 9th day of
July, 1873, by troops of Honduras stationed at Omoa, or by people of
Omoa.
The undersigned allows himself to repeat to the minister of the United
States that the overthrow of the government presided over by Señor
Arias, and under whose orders General Straeber acted, is the best
satisfaction that the government and people of Honduras can give to the
Government of the United States.
The undersigned embraces the hope and has the profound conviction that
the Government of the United States will feel itself satisfied from the
deferential proofs of justice which the government of Honduras has given
on this disagreeable incident for which it has so much felt.
Repeating to his excellency Senor Williamson, minister of the United
States, the high considerations of esteem with which I subscribe myself
as his most attentive and obedient servant,
To His Excellency Mr. George
Williamson,
Minister Resident of the
United States in Central America.
[Inclosure 3 in No.
322.—Translation.]
Mr. Zuniga to Mr.
Williamson.
Comayagua, March 22,
1875.
Sir: The undersigned, secretary of state and
minister of foreign affairs, complying with what was said and agreed
upon in the protocol, signed this day with his excellency Mr. George
Williamson, minister resident of the United States, pauses to explain
in extenso the constitutional reasons why the
government of Honduras cannot comply with the demand of the minister of
the United States, in that part which is in relation to the dismissal of
the chief or officer who commanded the troops of Honduras when the
outrage on the American consulate took place, and for the inability of
said chief or officer to obtain offices of honor, trust, or profit,
under the government of the republic.
The depriving of a title, or degrading from any office, civil or
military, according to the laws of Honduras, is, on the universal
principles of legislation, a penalty that discredits or renders infamous
a man who falls under its stigma. By the 92d article of the constitution
of Honduras only the tribunals established previously by law can judge
and take cognizance of civil and criminal cases of the people of
Honduras; and by the 97th article of the same constitution, the laws,
orders, providences, condemnatory without trial
are unjust, oppressive, and null. Consequently, the degrading of the
chief or officer who commanded the forces of Honduras at Omoa can only
be pronounced by the tribunals that have been by law established, after
previous audience of the said officer, the slowwness and formality of a
trial, and sentence to take effect, intervening.
So far as regards the inability to obtain employment of honor, of trust,
or of profit in the republic, it is also another penalty that the
executive power cannot impose, as it is out of the border of its
attributes and belongs solely to the competence of the judiciary
power.
By the 101st article of our constitution every citizen can be admitted to
all public offices, civil, political, and military, without difference,
according to their talents and virtues; and according to the 15th and
16th articles of the same constitution, the right of citizenship is lost
or suspended, among others of less signification, for sentence
pronounced, for a crime meriting a penalty more than correctional, tried
criminally and condemned to prison. The chief or officer who commanded
the troops of Honduras at Omoa is not suspended from his rights of
citizenship, in conformity with the constitutional prescriptions that I
have pointed out. But even if he were suspended from his rights of
citizenship, there would always be the necessity for a sentence executed
(executoriada) to disable him temporarily or
absolutely to obtain office of honor, of trust, and of profit.
[Page 162]
This country having been devoured by anarchy and civil war, especially
during the last three years, the national Congress, by decree of the 9th
of February of this year, which I inclose in this dispatch, concedes to
the ex-governors of Honduras and their agents a full and unconditional
amnesty, and absolute oblivion of all acts of a political or official
character, for which they became culpable, as well as the towns which
have remained in open and latent rebellion against the past
governments.
Peace, Mr. Minister, is the first and most argent necessity to this small
and worn-out republic, and peace cannot be obtained unless the past is
forgotten and we prepare ourselves, from recent and painful experience,
to work out a better future.
Such a policy, Mr. Minister, of oblivion, of tolerance and amalgamation,
has been found to operate well during the past year, and the government
of Honduras promises itself to obtain a long breath of peace for this
people exhausted by fatigue, but in whom the fire of passion can be
again excited at any moment, and renew our misfortunes unless moderation
and prudence preside over the councils of government.
With these considerations the undersigned believes that the Government of
the United States, so desirous for the peace and progress of the
American republics of Spanish origin, will feel satisfied with the clear
and frank explanations above stated in relation to the constitutional
difficulty which the government of Honduras meets in non-fulfillment or
compliance with the demand of the minister of the United States in
regard to the degradation and removal of the chief or officer who
commanded the forces of Honduras at Omoa. The undersigned further
believes that the Government of the United States would not exact in any
case, and much less from this small nation, that yesterday commenced
consolidating its institutions, anything repugnant or in collision with
the fundamental laws which it has given.
The undersigned again and lastly expresses to the minister of the United
States his conviction and his hope that the Government of the United
States, in view of what that of Honduras has done, and the impossibility
of doing more toward the vindication or satisfaction of the Government
of the United States for the outrage committed on the American consulate
at Omoa, will consider itself completely satisfied, so giving another
proof that it knows how to contain itself within the limits of justice,
notwithstanding the greatness of its power, in its bearing and relations
with weak nations.
I reiterate to his excellency, Mr. Williamson, minister of the United
States, the assurance of the distinguished consideration and high
appreciation with which I subscribe myself,
His most obedient servant,
His Excellency Mr. George
Williamson,
Minister Resident of the
United States in Central America.
[Inclosure in 3 in No.
322.—Translation.]
Decree No. 25.
The President of the Republic of
Honduras ta its inhabitants:
Know that the sovereign Congress has decreed the following: The
constitutional Congress of the republic—
Considering that the republic finds itself in the enjoyment of the most
perfect peace, and the government in possession of all the necessary
means to preserve that inestimable good; considering that it is a high
duty of Congress to select the means by which to give final security,
strengthening the peace and harmonious order of things, in all the
constituent elements of society;
Considering that national and civil wars, administrative errors, have
thrown upon the ex-governors of Honduras, and some towns, grave charges,
and on this account have arisen cruel social hatreds and an odious
spirit of reciprocal criminations for all those who have figured in the
political scene; considering that in consequence, and coming from such
opposite elements, have been produced the unjust quarrels that have
reduced the republic; the prolonging this order of things, festering
party spirit, and throwing itself into fratricidal contentions, the land
(patria) cannot take the repose that it so
much requires for its sons to be united and to follow in the roads of
progress;
Considering that in such a melancholy expectation in which the public
(pueblo) of Honduras is the victim, it is
necessary to recur to the highest feelings of patriotism, to cut at the
root the revolutionary ferment, give to oblivion past acts, although
touching the public conduct of the different ex-governors that have
succeeded to power, and in whom perhaps there was not wanting good
intention, but the opportunity of acting Well with a triumphal exit:
In presence of these considerations that represent the general feeling of
the country, and making use of the noble prerogative, conceded by the
section 18th, 24th article of the constitution, proclaims unanimously
the following decree:
[Page 163]
- Article 1. Conceding a general,
fall, and unconditional amnesty, and absolute forgetfulness of
all the acts, crimes, political and official faults, that have
been committed within the territory of the republic, by any
town, the governments and agents, in any time, up to the
publication of this law.
- In consequence, all criminal proceedings that are commenced or
are in court, instancia, relative to
acts, crimes, or faults embraced in this amnesty, will be
stopped, excepting fiscal responsibility of all that have
administered public funds, who ought to give an account as by
law established.
- Art. 2. All that are absent from the
republic, for the enunciated causes, are in full liberty to
return to their homes when they please, without the necessity of
passport.
- Art. 3. All those who are
comprehended in this pardon (gratia)
purposing to disturb constitutional order, lose it by the same
act.
- Art. 4. It remains null and void
(derogado) in all its parts, The
decree of 28th April, 1875, emitted by the national
convention.
Given in the hall of sessions of the
national Congress in Comayagua
the 9th of February,
1875.
JOSÉ MARIA ZELAYA, D. P.
CARLOS MADRID, D. T.
MANUEL SAMERO, D. P. T.
To the supreme executive power.
Let it therefore be executed.
Comayagua, February 9,
1875.
- PONCIANO LEIVA.
- ADOLFO ZUNIGA,
Minister of
Government and Justice.
[Inclosure 4 in No. 322.]
Mr. Williamson to
Mr. Zuniga.
Legation of the United States in Central
America,
Comayagua,
Honduras, March 23,
1875.
Sir: I have the pleasure of acknowledging the
receipt of the two notes of your excellency dated yesterday, the 22d
instant, relating to the settlement of the question which unhappily
arose between the United States and Honduras, because of the outrage
committed upon the United States consulate at Omoa on or about the 9th
of July, A. D. 1873.
Your excellency states both of the notes have been addressed to me in
accordance with the terms of the protocol signed by us on the 22d
instant. One of them is an apology, and the other purports to explain
in extenso, the constitutional and legal
obstacles that have prevented your excellency’s government from acceding
to the third article of the demand for satisfaction for the outrage
above referred to. The latter is accompanied by a copy of a decree of
general amnesty passed by the Congress of Honduras at its session of
1875.
Copies of the notes and decree, together with the protocol, will be
forwarded to my Government by the first mail.
Before replying further to your excellency’s notes, I take occasion to
reiterate to you in this formal manner my confident belief the protocol
will be approved.
Your excellency will be pleased to understand and rest assured that the
Government of the United States has no disposition to interfere in the
domestic affairs of Honduras, and to dictate whether any of her citizens
shall be punished without legal trial for an insult to the flag of the
United States and a flagrant violation of the treaty between the United
States and Honduras. Yet it may learn with regret that any
constitutional or legal difficulties exist which may prevent your
excellency’s government from taking steps to insure itself against the
recurrence of such an outrage, and its consequences, should the same
official ever again unhappily command the forces of Honduras.
Your excellency is also assured that my Government, desirous of
maintaining the peaceful relations which have always happily subsisted
between the United States and Honduras, will gravely weigh the
constitutional and legal difficulties your excellency has presented,
and, it is hoped, may reach the conclusion that its honor has been fully
vindicated. The Government of the United States, being a government of
law, in which the safety of the state and the liberty of the citizen are
considered in danger if arbitrary and unconstitutional acts are
permitted, cannot be presumed to have asked the government of a sister
republic to set at defiance its own constitution and laws; but may have
justly expected your excellency’s government to have initiated the
necessary judicial proceedings to satisfy its legitimate demand.
[Page 164]
It is not permitted me to omit the observation that my Government is not
to be considered in the light of a prosecutor of the person who happened
to be in command at the time the outrage was committed. He is, perhaps,
unknown in the United States, except as the person whose name was
rendered conspicuous by the outrage upon the consulate at Omoa in July,
1873, and other notorious events of that period. It might have been
supposed that the government of Honduras would, of its motion, prosecute
to the full extent of the law an official who had done so much to
imperil the peaceful relations of the country he professed to serve, and
to discredit at home and abroad the uniform he wore.
In view of such possible considerations, it may be a matter of surprise
to my Government to learn the fact (for the first time communicated in
your excellency’s note of yesterday) that this official has been
embraced in the bill of amnesty passed by the Congress while the demand
for satisfaction was still pending.
I beg leave to express my just appreciation of the difficulties with
which your excellency’s government has found itself surrounded, and also
to add the expression of the hope that this question has been settled
definitively upon terms equally satisfactory to the United States and
Honduras.
Renewing to your excellency the assurance of my high consideration, I
have the honor to subscribe myself, your excellency’s obedient
servant,
His Excellency Señor Licenciado Don A.
Zuniga,
Minister of Foreign Affairs
of Honduras.