740.0011 European War 1939/29461

The American Political Adviser at Algiers (Murphy) to the Secretary of State

No. 76

Subject: Transmitting Copies of Correspondence Exchanged between General Henri Giraud and Robert D. Murphy in October and November, 1942.

Sir: I have the honor to refer to the Department’s telegraphic instruction no. 426 of March 1019 requesting that the Department be supplied with copies of three letters dated November 2 exchanged between General Henri Giraud and myself.

As the Department was informed by my telegram no. 385 of March 14, 7 p.m.,19 Mr. John McCloy, Assistant Secretary of War, had already departed from North Africa prior to the receipt of the Department’s telegram under reference.

I enclose in original and translation copies of three informal letters,20 the originals of which were initialled by me and addressed to General Giraud.

I also enclose copies in original and translation of a letter of October 27,21 and two letters dated October 28, 1942,22 addressed to me and initialled by General Giraud. It will be noted that the letter of October 27 incorporated part of the text of one of the letters of November 2, and one of General Giraud’s letters of October 28 incorporates all of the text of another of my letters of November 2. The reason for this disparity of dates is that the rough draft, undated, of these two communications was transmitted secretly to General Giraud by messenger while he was still in France. His letters of October 27 and 28 constituted his approval of the drafts and at his request these were confirmed by clean copies which I initialled.

I also enclose a copy in original and translation of General Giraud’s letter to me of November 1, 1942,23 and of my acknowledgment of November 2.24

There is also enclosed a copy of a draft of an “Accord de Principe”25 and its enclosures26 initialled by General Giraud on October 27, 1942. [Page 413] Copies of my letters of November 2, as well as General Giraud’s suggested “Accord de Principe” of October 27 (which I did not initial) were forwarded to the Commander-in-Chief, European Theater,27 via our Naval Attaché at Tangier.28 Copies were also supplied to General Mark W. Clark at the time of his visit to Algeria on October 22, 1942.29

The Department is informed that these negotiations were conducted under the authorization contained in the President’s Directive of September 22, 1942.30

Respectfully yours,

Robert D. Murphy

Chief Civil Administrator

Enclosures:31

1
—Letter to General Giraud, dated November 2, 1942.
2
—Letter to General Giraud dated November 2, 1942.
3
—Letter to General Giraud dated November 2, 1942.
4
—Letter to Robert D. Murphy dated October 27, 1942.
5
—Letter to Robert D. Murphy dated October 28, 1942.
6
—Letter to Robert D. Murphy dated October 28, 1942.
7
—Letter to Robert D. Murphy dated November 1, 1942.
8
—Letter to General Giraud dated November 2, 1942.
9
—Copy of “Accord de Principe”
10
—Annexe I to “Accord de Principe”
11
—Annexe II to “Accord de Principe”
12
—Annexe III to “Accord de Principe”

Translations attached to each enclosure.32

[Enclosure 1—Translation]

The Personal Representative of President Roosevelt (Murphy) to General Henri Giraud

The General: To reply to various questions which have been put to me in your name, I have the honor to advise you that: [Page 414]

(1)
The American Government will extend the benefits of the Lend-Lease Act33 to the orders which will be transmitted to the United States in order to give the French Army the means of participating in the common struggle.
(2)
The American Government will facilitate the negotiation and execution of these orders.
(3)
The American Government will likewise expedite orders in the United States for, and the rapid delivery of, the necessary foodstuffs for the civilian population in those French territories which will be free themselves, or will be freed from the domination of the Axis.
(4)
Adequate measures are already being taken to lay by, in anticipation of these deliveries, a quantity of commodities of which there is an especially urgent need, not only to relieve the populations, but also to assure a better functioning of the means of transportation, and to aid in the resumption of local production.
(5)
Insofar as French North Africa is concerned, the list of these first “needs” which the Government of the United States agrees to satisfy as soon as possible, as soon as the break is made between these territories and the Armistice Commissions, appear on the attached enclosure which is in no wise all-inclusive.
(6)
To hasten the arrival of these commodities the Government of the United States expects, however, that the French merchant ships in French North African ports will, at the proper time aid in such transporting.
(7)
These deliveries of merchandise will be considered as official French purchases and invoiced at world-wide rates. For the acceptance and invoicing of these commodities, reference will be made in principle to the rules now followed in the application of the Franco-American Agreement of 1941 for the provisioning of North Africa.
(8)
Payment will be made in kind. Credits corresponding to the amount of the deliveries will be opened in North Africa for the account of the American Government. These credits will be utilized either for the needs of the Treasury of the United States for its eventual military expenditures and its quartermaster purchases in French Africa, or for the payment of exports from North Africa to the United States.
(9)
In case it becomes evident that American expenditures and purchases in Africa will not cover these deliveries for civilian needs, the question of the means of payment to be employed will be reexamined by mutual agreement.
(10)
The American Government undertakes to facilitate insofar as it is possible to do so, the disposal of North African products which, [Page 415] as a result of circumstances, are deprived of their normal outlets. As soon as military collaboration is accomplished, conversations will ensue to study the conditions under which these goods could be distributed, the list of which will be supplied by the French authorities.
(11)
Being firmly resolved to do everything compatible with the conduct of the war, to avoid aggravating the suffering of the population of Metropolitan France, already so sorely tried, the Government of the United States will not raise any objections to measures of assistance which the French people, freed from the domination of the Axis, may desire to take to aid other populations of the French nation. The practice of sending “family” packages, for relief of Metropolitan cities adopted by African cities, Red Cross gifts, etc., should be in its opinion, continued between North Africa and Metropolitan France, subject to the restriction that the necessary safeguards be taken to insure that these parcels may not be diverted from their destination.

R[obert] D. M[urphy]
[Enclosure 2—Translation]

The Personal Representative of President Roosevelt (Murphy) to General Henri Giraud

The General: I have the honor to acknowledge receipt of your letter of October 28, as follows:

“I consider it of the greatest importance that in case of combined military operations in French territories (either in Metropolitan France or overseas) which are not occupied under the terms of the Armistice Conventions by the Axis Powers, that the Expeditionary Corps of the United Nations which would come to collaborate with the local French troops should be an essentially American expedition placed under American command.

There should be no participation of dissident French elements.

It is only later, and after an understanding between the local French and American authorities that, in case of need, non-American Allied, or dissident French formations may be sent into these French territories.”

[Here follows last paragraph of French text omitted from the enclosed translation:

I am glad to assure you that your point of view is perfectly in harmony with the point of view of my government.]

R[obert] D. M[urphy]
[Page 416]
[Enclosure 3—Translation]

The Personal Representative of President Roosevelt (Murphy) to General Henri Giraud

The General: Referring to the declaration made on several occasions by President Roosevelt, and the obligations already undertaken by the American Government as well as by the British Government, I am able to assure you that the restoration of France to full independence, in all the greatness and vastness which it possessed before the war in Europe as well as overseas, is one of the war aims of the United Nations.

It is thoroughly understood that French sovereignty will be reestablished as soon as possible throughout all the territory, metropolitan and colonial, over which flew the French flag in 1939.

The Government of the United States considers the French nation as an ally and will treat it as such.

May I add further that in case of military operations in French territory (whether in Metropolitan France or in the Colonies) in all instances where French collaboration may be found, the American authorities will not intervene in any way in those affairs which are solely within the province of the national administration or which have to do with the exercise of French sovereignty.

Insofar as the command is concerned, the Government of the United States has no other thought or desire than to place the military command of this area in the hands of the French as soon as possible. However, during those phases of the operation comprising the debarkation, establishing the security of French North Africa, and supplying the necessary base, it is considered essential that the American command and the organization which has been set up with such effort and difficulty, especially for this operation, remain unchanged. (The above clause is a result of the recent conference between the American and French representatives. It was drawn up before the receipt of your note of October 2734 reading as follows:

“It is altogether normal, and it is understood, that all the operations of debarkation will be controlled by the General Staff of the American Army.

“The Inter-allied Command will begin to function after the debarkation, that is to say, for each point of debarkation, forty-eight hours after the hour set for the beginning of the initial landing operations of the first convoy. With respect to subsequent operations, the American troops will come under the Inter-allied Command as soon as they are landed.”

[Page 417]

I am communicating your suggestion to the General Staff of the American Army and I am certain that an agreeable solution will be found.) During this period, the Government of the United States will make every effort to supply the French forces with modern arms and equipment. While the equipping and organizing of the French Army will thus be accomplished, the details concerning the command can be completed so that the French will be in a position to take over the Supreme Command at the proper time.35 It would be desirable, in order to facilitate the direction of the operations, to have a General of the French Army attached as Deputy to the Commander-in-Chief immediately after the debarkation.

R[obert] D. M[urphy]
[Enclosure 4—Translation]

General Henri Giraud to the Personal Representative of President Roosevelt (Murphy)

Mr. Counselor of Embassy: You have been good enough to write me as of today’s date, the following letter:

“Referring to the declarations made on several occasions by President Roosevelt, and the obligations already undertaken by the American Government as well as by the British Government, I am able to assure you that the restoration of France to full independence, in all the greatness and vastness which it possessed before the war in Europe as well as overseas, is one of the war aims of the United Nations.

“It is thoroughly understood that French sovereignty will be reestablished as soon as possible throughout all the territory, metropolitan and colonial, over which flew the French flag in 1939.

“The Government of the United States considers the French nation as an ally and will treat it as such.

“May I add further that in case of military operations in French territory (whether in Metropolitan France or in the Colonies) in all instances where French collaboration may be found, the American authorities will not intervene in any way in those affairs which are solely within the province of the national administration or which have to do with the exercise of French sovereignty.

“The Government of the United States is ready to aid, with abundant supplies of all the necessary materials, the rapid rebirth of a French army under French command.”

I have the honor to acknowledge receipt of this communication of which I have taken due note.

H[enri] G[iraud]
[Page 418]
[Enclosure 5—Translation]

General Henri Giraud to the Personal Representative of President Roosevelt (Murphy)

Mr. Counselor:

[Here follows the quoted text of Enclosure 2, page 415.]

H[enri] G[iraud]
[Enclosure 6—Translation]

General Henri Giraud to the Personal Representative of President Roosevelt (Murphy)

Mr. Counselor of Embassy: You have been good enough to write me, as of today’s date, the following letter.

[Here follows the text of Enclosure 1, page 413.]

I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of this communication, of which I take due note.

H[enri] G[iraud]
[Enclosure 7—Translation]

General Henri Giraud to the Personal Representative of President Roosevelt (Murphy)

Mr. Counselor: I thank you for your confidence. You will not be disappointed.

I am certain that the armies of America and France, acting in close conjunction, will insure ultimate victory. You will have been one of the good artisans.

Please accept [etc.]

H[enri] Giraud
[Enclosure 8—Translation]

The Personal Representative of President Roosevelt (Murphy) to General Henri Giraud

The General: I am very grateful for your letter of November 1 and I am in entire accord, as is President Roosevelt, with your feeling that the French and American Armies, operating in close conjunction, will assure final victory.

[Page 419]

The thoroughly unsatisfactory means of communication at our disposition have unfortunately hindered a more satisfactory correspondence between us. I hope that they will soon be remedied. We could accomplish so many things more quickly with a better liaison.

I may add that upon my departure from Washington, the President of the United States instructed me to convey his regards and good wishes for the success of our collaboration.

I beg you to accept [etc.]

R[obert] D. M[urphy]
[Enclosure 9—Translation]

General Henri Giraud to the Personal Representative of President Roosevelt (Murphy)36

Agreement in Principle

The projected operation presents the greatest chances for success from the strategical point of view.

It calls for considerable effort which will not be easily renewed. It is, therefore, necessary to insure every chance of success and to eliminate as much risk as possible.

The more rapid the progress of the operation, the more complete will be its success.

A landing is always a difficult operation. It is of utmost importance to make sure that throughout the duration of the operation there will be no resistance either on sea, land, or in the air. Only the people on the spot can indicate the moment of maximum security.

It would be extremely desirable for the French fleet in particular not only to refrain from hindering the operation, but to regard it favorably. A similar hypothesis would have been impossible to envisage a few months ago. An evolution of opinion is now going on which can make it possible within a period of time difficult to specify, but perhaps not too far distant.

On land, bloodshed must be avoided at all costs between troops destined later to labor for the common cause. There also a favorable spirit is developing. It would be heartbreaking to jeopardize it by an untimely haste.

The reasons given for an immediate attack have much value. However, they are not all equal. It is necessary, above all, to forestall any enemy initiative. Intelligence work well done and completely objective in France, in Italy, in Tripolitania and in Spain, will keep the Allied General Staff fully advised of the possibilities [Page 420] of the adversary. The strategic stake is so important that political motives must remain secondary.

The means have been fully calculated and should suffice. It will necessitate an enormous tonnage which is supposed to exist, but which will inevitably suffer a certain percentage of loss. If one concedes the normal ratio of five tons as the minimum required to transport one man, it means that for the force envisaged, the General Staff must be assured of a minimum total of twenty-five million tons before launching the operations.

The protective cover, naval and aerial, appears to be sufficient. It can not, however, pretend to prevent all submarine or aerial torpedo attack. The less time the transports lie abreast of the coast of French North Africa, the better.

It is quite normal and it is understood, that all the landing operations will be regulated by the General Staff of the American Army.

The Inter-allied Command will begin to function after the landing, that is to say, for each point of debarkation, forty-eight hours after the hour set for the beginning of the initial landing operations of the first convoy. With respect to subsequent operations, the American troops will come under the Inter-allied Command as soon as they are landed.37

Fundamentally, the operation must aim at the total occupation of French North Africa, first to forestall any German-Italian reaction, then to prepare the march toward the East and liquidate the question of Tripolitania.

But the importance of this tremendous effort does not end there. It must afford the American army a chance to get a footing on the European Continent. It is therein that, in the final analysis, lies the real strategic stake of the operation. It is vital for the American Army.

That part of the European Continent not yet subjected to Axis occupation, that is to say, the Iberian Peninsula and the French Mediterranean Coast, must engage our attention. The French seacoast between Port-Vendres and Toulon, if one assumes that Nice will fall immediately into the hands of the Italians, seems at present to offer the maximum chances of success. On the other hand, the security of the operations envisaged in French North Africa requires that Axis troops be prevented, as long as possible, from using the ports and the flying fields of the French Coast. The maintenance of a bridge-head on the Mediterranean Coast could be achieved by the Metropolitan French forces, on condition that they be assured of American support both of matériel and personnel.

[Page 421]

It is quite logical that the American General Staff should not wish to divert a part of the forces coming from America for this operation, but it should be relatively easy to accomplish this with units stationed in Ireland and transported by plane to the Coast, while the matériel previously stored at Gibraltar would be brought at the first signal into the designated ports. This means, besides the armament proper of the American forces, anti-tank and anti-aircraft matériel, pursuit planes, fuel and munitions, totalling some 40,000 tons not counting the fuel. If one admits that it requires 100,000 tons of supplies of all kinds for the American troops arriving by air, it is evident that the maritime tonnage to be reserved at Gibraltar is insignificant compared with the total.

This question is closely related to that of the landing in Africa, for it is certain that this debarkation will immediately bring about the occupation by the Germans of that part of France still free. She may resist, and will, if she is sure of immediate American support. This support is possible if it is foreseen and preparations made therefor. It is necessary in order that the Franco-American union may be complete and fruitful.

Regarding aviation, the total contribution of 2,000 planes seems insufficient. There should be an ample supply of pursuit planes in particular. It is necessary to earmark at least 250 planes for the defense of the Metropolitan bridge-head. As to transport planes, first based in Ireland, it is understood that they will be available for the African operation as soon as they have disembarked their passengers on the Mediterranean Coast.

Two other points still remain to be clarified, both from the diplomatic as well as the military point of view, that is the attitude of Spain on the one hand, and of Italy on the other.

It would be of the greatest importance to have Spain on our side. In any case it is hazardous to plunge into an operation in winter in Spanish Morocco. There is the risk of losing men, matériel, and above all, time. It is expedient in this connection to remain on the defensive, strongly fortifying the border with mines and anti-tank cannons so as to bring to bear the full force of the effort as soon as possible against Tunisia, particularly on Bizerte and Cape Bon. On the other hand, the entrance of the Germans into Spain (in a race to the free continent) might justify an operation into Spanish Morocco.

As to Italy, it will be necessary to persuade her that her best interest lies in remaining quiet, lacking a subsequent adhesion not to be eliminated, in the face of a specifically German-American struggle.

The evolution of the situation in Egypt and the losses sustained in Russia are sufficient reasons for Italy to be unwilling to play Germany’s game in this adventure.

[Page 422]

To sum up, the Inter-allied Commander-in-Chief in North Africa accepts the propositions of the American General Staff for the debarkation in Algeria and Morocco, provided that he himself set the date for the landing, following American advices that preparations are completed.

He desires that this African operation coincide with the landing on the French Coasts of the Mediterranean of American personnel coming from Ireland—50,000 men in principle—and of matériel coming from Gibraltar,—140,000 tons in principle—upon radioed request from the French command.

At the same time British attacks on the Atlantic Coast, in the English Channel and the North Sea, Russian attacks on the Eastern Front and an attack on Rommel’s Army should bring about the dispersal of the enemy’s reserves, and prevent in particular concentrations of planes and Panzer Divisions both in the Mediterranean and in Unoccupied France.

All these efforts taking place simultaneously will guarantee success.


H[enri] G[iraud]
[Enclosure 10]

Annex I

[Here follows an Intelligence Plan to detect efforts of the enemy in French North Africa and in the Free Zone. The preface statement, “Plan d’opérations du Général Giraud pour une tête de pont française sur la côte méditerranéenne (27 octobre 1942),” was not included in this despatch. It is published in General Giraud’s memoirs, Un seul but, la victoire: Alger, 1942–1944, with Annex I, on pages 336–339.]

[Enclosure 11]

Annex II

[Here follows the text of “Material Required—1st Urgency to be stocked at Gibraltar and to be transported upon request.” This annex is published in General Giraud’s memoirs, Un seul but, la victoire: Alger, 1942–1944, p. 340.]

[Enclosure 12]

Annex III

[Here follows the text of “Material—2nd Urgency to be transported between D–2 and D–10.” This annex is published in General Giraud’s memoirs, Un seul but, la victoire: Alger, 1942–1944, p. 341.]

  1. This despatch, although dated in 1943, is printed here because of its enclosures dated from October 27 to November 2, 1942.
  2. Not printed.
  3. Not printed.
  4. Enclosures 1, 2, and 3.
  5. Enclosure 4.
  6. Enclosures 5 and 6.
  7. Enclosure 7.
  8. Enclosure 8.
  9. Enclosure 9.
  10. Enclosures 10, 11, and 12.
  11. Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower.
  12. Lt. Col. William A. Eddy.
  13. On October 22, 1942, General Clark made a secret visit to Algeria, landing near Cherchel where he had conferences with members of the North African resistance. As a result of this meeting, a letter written by Mr. Murphy to General Giraud (see enclosure 4) was modified (see enclosure 3). Further information may be found in the following volumes: “Crusoé” [Jacques Lemaigre-Dubreuil], Vicissitudes d’une victoire (Paris, Les éditions de l’âme française, 1946), and Albert Kammerer, Du débarquement africain au meurtre de Darlan (Paris, Flammarion, 1949).
  14. In an unnumbered instruction, April 17, 1943, not printed, the Secretary of State requested a copy of the President’s directive. This directive is printed on p. 379.
  15. The enclosures are printed in same order as listed here. General Henri Giraud, in his memoirs, Un seul but, la victoire: Alger, 1942–1944 (Paris, Julliard, 1949), prints enclosure 3 as the first letter, enclosure 1 as the second letter, and enclosure 2 as the third letter, which order is followed in French volumes.
  16. All translations printed from this despatch were translated by Ridgeway Knight, Vice Consul at Algiers.
  17. Lend-Lease Act approved March 11, 1941; 55 Stat. 31.
  18. For full text of the note of October 27 (the “Agreement in Principle”), see enclosure 9, p. 419.
  19. See George F. Howe, Northwest Africa: Seizing the Initiative in the West, p. 82, footnote 69.
  20. The French text is published in General Giraud’s memoirs, Un seul but, la victoire, pp. 342–345.
  21. Both this paragraph and the one preceding, with minor changes of translation, were incorporated in the letter of November 2, 1942, from Mr. Murphy to General Giraud, enclosure 3, p. 416.