265. Memorandum From the President’s Military Representative (Taylor) to the President’s Special Assistant for National Security Affairs (Bundy)0
SUBJECT
- The Korean Military Assistance Program
I was recently briefed on the Cary Report1 on the possible reduction of MAP supported military forces in Korea. I understand it has pleased no one since it does not come up with an easy solution to the problem of reducing force levels. I am also aware that the JCS have reviewed the matter and come out strongly for the maintenance of the present levels.
[Page 577]I have three observations to make on the matter. The first is that it is highly unlikely that responsible U.S. military authorities will ever recommend a reduction in Korean force levels unless assured of the availability of [less than 1 line of source text not declassified] in case of the intervention in Korea of ChiCom forces in significant strength. With such an assurance, they would be justified in limiting the mission of South Korean forces to off-setting the North Korean establishment. Without that assurance [1½ lines of source text not declassified]there is no military ground to support a substantial cut in Korean conventional forces.
[1 paragraph (3½ lines of source text) not declassified]
A final comment is to wonder why, with all the pressure on the Department of Defense to support a reduction in the level of Korean forces, has the State Department never been asked to find a political solution to the armistice impasse? The North Koreans and their supporters must be just as tired of the present situation as we are. A minimum political objective would be to secure agreement on both sides to dismantle the fortified front and to maintain a frontier no more heavily defended than the frontier separating, say, Czechoslovakia from West Germany. Why do we not ask our diplomats to ply at their trade of negotiations?
- Source: Kennedy Library, National Security Files, Countries Series, Korea, General, 3/62-7/62. Secret.↩
- Printed in part as an attachment to Document 258.↩