751G.00/12–1154: Telegram
The Chargé in Vietnam (Kidder) to the Department of State
top secret
Saigon, December 11, 1954—7
p.m.
2205. Repeated information Paris 693. Limit distribution. From Collins. Re Paris telegram 2417 to Department.1
[Page 2360]- 1.
- While wording of paragraph 8 Embassy telegram 2108,2 may have simple unilateral approach to Bao Dai, it was not my intent that step of this importance should be taken without my discussing it with Ely. I agree to principle of frank and full exchange with French, but recall in this connection Secretary’s reservation, in recent conversation with Mendes-France, of our right to consult unilaterally with Vietnamese. I have informed Ely of this reservation, adding that I would keep him generally informed regarding all matters of mutual interest. I hope the French will keep us similarly informed of their moves and believe Ely, for his part, will do so.
- 2.
- As long as Bao Dai remains Chief of State I agree there may be no option, but that he continue as Commander-in-Chief with power to intervene in such cases as Diem–Hinh dispute which possibly could have led to forcible overthrow of government. What I consider intolerable, however, is that he should entertain and adjudicate appeals regarding what should be routine administrative matters. As long as it is known or believed Bao Dai is available to arbitrate any disagreement between head of government and latter’s nominal subordinates, way is open for repeated violations of discipline and good order. I believe, therefore, we should consider means of conveying this idea to Bao Dai. His cooperation in Hinh affair I take to be encouraging augury for future in this respect, although I realize Bao Dai and especially his entourage will be reluctant foreswear technique of government by remote control which they have long since adapted to their own purposes and interests.
- 3.
- I do not propose we “attempt to remove Bao Dai’s authority” but that we urge him to delegate, as matter of course, all his authority to head of government, retaining only ultimate authority (until constitutional provision is made for other procedures) to appoint head of government.
- 4.
- If Department agrees with this line of reasoning, and so indicates, I will be glad to discuss it with Ely.
Kidder