740.00119 Control (Hungary)/7–347

The Chief of the United States Representation on the Allied Control Commission for Hungary (Weems) to the Chargé in Hungary (Bigelow)1

secret

Dear Mr. Bigelow: Acknowledgment is made of your note of 14 June 1947 with reference to the Department of State’s request for certain information in regard to misuse of the Allied Control Commission by the Soviet Representation.2

In this connection I would like to call your attention to the fact that, while the Allied Control Commission has been of assistance to American nationals in various matters, in my opinion it has had very little effect on the control and direction of the Government of Hungary. This is the principal matter concerning Hungary, in which the American Representation has had no voice whatsoever. The Soviet Chairman and the Soviet Minister, Mr. Pushkin, have directly and through the Communist Party of Hungary, taken unilateral actions daily in this regard. On major Hungarian Government decisions, approval—formal or informal—of Soviet authorities’ had to be obtained. This included cabinet appointments and appointments at least of that of state secretaries and diplomatic representatives. It also includes agreements with other governments, such as trade, air and various types of other international agreements. Matters concerning the Hungarian Army under [Page 325] the Armistice Agreement and the Allied Control Commission Statutes were also subject to Soviet Allied Control Commission supervision. These various matters have been handled without consultation of or any reference whatsoever to the British and American Representatives. They have been handled in such a way that it was not possible to place them on the agenda of the Allied Control Commission. They have been accomplished by the Soviets secretly by personal interview with various Hungarian Ministers and state officials and have succeeded because of fear of the Soviet Occupational Forces. This fear can be defined as fear of loss of governmental position or fear of loss of personal liberty through arrest by Soviet authorities or Hungarian Communist-controlled police on trumped-up charges. Before the crisis, which ended in the resignation of Mr. Nagy and Mr. Gyöngyösi and others, two ministers lost their positions due to the Soviet interference. Many Smallholder deputies have been expelled from the Smallholders Party on Communist Party insistence. The opposition party newspaper was suppressed by the Communist-controlled Trade Union Council. Members of the Smallholders and other persons in public life expressing anti-Communistic views have disappeared and finally through conspiracy charges, the character of the entire government has been changed. The Smallholders Party was not given a chance to elect a prime minister, for which they had the right, being holders of an absolute majority. In turn they were given a recommendation to accept as prime minister one of their party having thus only nominally and for outward appearance the post of prime ministry, a minority party is in control of Hungary.

I consider these unilateral actions on the part of the Soviets as far more important than the specific instances of misue and unilateral actions by Soviets which are listed on the inclosure herewith.

Sincerely yours,

Geo. H. Weems

Brigadier General, U.S. Army

Memorandum by the Chief of the United States Representation on the Allied Control Commission for Hungary (Weems)

[Enclosure]
secret

Subject: Instances of misuse of Allied Control Commission by arbitrary exercise of authority by Soviet element of the Allied Control Commission for Hungary.

It is pointed out that unilateral action on the part of the Soviet element of the Allied Control Commission, or in the name of the Soviet High Command, has been the normal procedure. It should be [Page 326] noted, however, that the terms of the Armistice Agreement with Hungary give broad authority to both the Chairman of the Allied Control Commission and the Soviet Occupational Forces.

The cases listed below indicate the means by which the Soviet element of the Allied Control Commission has been able to circumvent the desires of the American and British Representations.

1.
14 May 1945 information received from Hungarian sources revealed additional Soviet demands for factories, machinery and commodities as reparations under Article 12 of the Armistice Agreement. These demands had been made by the Russians in the name of the Allied Control Commission without consulting the American or British Representations. General Key informed the War Department by cable 19 May 1945 and by letter-courier to Chief of Staff inclosing demands and related documents of the History of the Mission from 1945 to July 1946; also a letter to the War Department informing them of Soviet failure to observe the Statutes of the Allied Control Commission.3
2.
The question of the size of the Hungarian Army during the Armistice period was raised at a meeting on 15 November 1945, when it appeared that instructions had been issued by the Soviet staff giving authority for the Hungarian Army to be of a certain size, and this had been done without consulting either the British or United States Representatives. The Chairman, Marshal Voroshilov, was understood to say that this had been done in error, and he then proceeded to have a report read out giving a mass of figures regarding the proposed Hungarian Army. He then asked the British and American Representatives to agree, and, quite naturally, they asked for time to examine the figures. However, the Chairman would not agree to this and said that he proposed to give instructions for the proposed organization to be effective immediately.4
3.
Early in 1946 both the American and British Representatives urged that an investigation should be made into the serious economic situation in Hungary, but this was refused.
4.
In August 1946 the question arose concerning the purge of Fascist and Reactionary organizations, etc., resulting from a letter passed to the Hungarian Government by the Deputy Chairman of the Allied Control Commission. The explanation was that the information was passed at the request of the Soviet High Command. Allied Control Commission meetings of 15 July, 24 July and 15 August refer to the matter.5
5.
In the fall of 1946 permission was given by the Soviet element of the Allied Control Commission for the formation of the Hungarian Freedom Party without consulting the Americans or British.6
6.
Early in 1947 the Hungarian police were ordered in the name of the Allied Control Commission to suppress the publication of Count Ciano’s Diary. At first the Acting Chairman attempted to explain that it probably was caused by a member of his staff calling the police headquarters and inquiring about the publication of this book. At later meetings of the Allied Control Commission it was clearly evident that the Soviet element of the Allied Control Commission had ordered a suppression of this book. Sviridov stated he was opposed to its publication and would refer the matter to Marshal Voroshilov for decision. No action has been taken nor is any expected.
7.
The Soviets’ actions in regard to air agreements are well known. Sviridov’s stand has been that only the Occupational Forces who control the air fields can permit the Hungarian Government to negotiate air agreements. Notwithstanding, the Soviets have formed the Maszovlet Company, Hungarian-Soviet civil air company. The Soviets have also permitted the Hungarian Government to negotiate agreements with certain other countries but not with the United States or Britain.
8.
In early 1947 Sviridov stated he had personally given approval to the Hungarian Government to resume diplomatic relations in the name of the Allied Control Commission and without prior discussion with British or Americans. He stated he did not consider this “a principal question”.
9.
Request was made in May 1947 through the Chairman of the Allied Control Commission to make certain visits to Hungarian Army units. Sviridov replied “the statutes of the Allied Control Commission do not give the right to your officers to visit parts and units of the Hungarian Army. On these grounds the Command of the Occupational Forces cannot give approval to visit one of the Hungarian Divisions”. This is clearly contrary to paragraph 1 (d) of the Armistice terms and paragraph 6 (d) of the Statutes of the Allied Control Commission.
10.
In a meeting of the Allied Control Commission 18 June 1947 the Acting Chairman stated that the Hungarian Minister for Defense had no topographical section and had no map-making equipment. It was further stated that the Minister of Defense reports that all maps were taken out by Szálasi’s regime. It is known that a large quantity of maps of varying scales are stored in the Hungarian Army Map Service building.
11.
The Soviets have taken over certain properties claimed by American interests. A specific instance is that of eight hundred seven (807) patents, property of German subsidiaries of IT&T. The Hungarian section of the mixed Soviet-Hungarian Reparations Commission informed the Soviets of the American Legation’s letter of 12 December 1946 setting forth our claim. The Soviet section nevertheless insisted upon taking over the patents.
12.
In spite of the provisions of the Armistice terms and the Statutes of the Allied Control Commission, the Soviets have not permitted free movement of the American element of the Allied Control Commission in Hungary. Hungarian nationals are permitted free movement.
13.
In spite of repeated protests the Soviet Occupational Forces controlled the MAORT Oil Company throughout practically the entire period of the Armistice. Control by Russian authorities was not released until 1 March 1947. Likewise they have used storage plants of the Vacuum Oil Company.
14.
The Soviets have failed to transmit to the American Representation data of interest to the United States Government as provided in paragraph 6 (a) and paragraph 6 (c) of the Statutes of the Allied Control Commission. The minutes of the meeting of the Allied Control Commission 18 June 19477 give full account of British and American views in regard to documents passed to the Hungarian Government by the Acting Chairman in the case of Béla Kovács.

  1. The source text was transmitted to the Department as an enclosure to despatch 3237, July 3, from Budapest, not printed.
  2. Telegram 625, June 11, to Budapest, not printed, requested the Legation, with the help of General Weems, to prepare a list of instances of Soviet misuse of the Allied Control Commission. In telegram 1111, June 28, from Budapest, not printed, Chargé Bigelow transmitted to the Department a list of 31 Soviet instances of Soviet misuse of the Commission—all but six of which had occurred in 1945 and 1946 (740.00119 Control (Hungary)/6–1147, 6–2847). Documentation on nearly all of the instances listed by Bigelow is included in Foreign Relations, 1945, vol. iv, pp. 798 ff. and ibid., 1946, vol. vi, pp. 250 ff.
  3. None of the documents under reference here are printed.
  4. See telegram Z–1172, November 16, 1945, from Budapest, Foreign Relations, 1945, vol. iv, p. 909.
  5. For documentation on the matters under reference here, see ibid., 1946, vol. vi, pp. 320 ff.
  6. See telegram 1994, October 23, 1946, from Budapest, Foreign Relations, 1946, vol. v, p. 339.
  7. Not printed.