File No. 838.111/80.]

The American Minister to the Secretary of State.

No. 1086.]

Sir: Referring to my No. 989 of December 19 last and in order to complete the files of the Department I have the honor to enclose herewith the reply of the Haitian Secretary of Foreign Relations to the identic note sent him by the Legation relative to the abrogation of trading privileges of Syrians in Haiti.

I have [etc.]

H. W. Furniss.
[Inclosure.—Translation]

The Haitian Minister for Foreign Affairs to the American Minister.

Mr. Minister: I have had the honor to receive your note No. 560 of the 8th instant, replying to mine of December 281 last concerning the notice inserted in the “Moniteur” of the 9th of the same month. This communication, however, like the first which you have taken the trouble to address me on this subject, is identical with the notes of the Ministers of France and the Dominican Republic, the Consuls of England and Cuba, which shows a previous understanding. I can only regret the tendency of the Representatives of the Foreign Powers to profit by the least incident to have recourse to the means of collective or identical notes. In calling your attention to the inconvenience of such practice, I am pleased to hope that I can count on your kind cooperation to aid me to discourage it.

In the meantime, I shall ask of you the permission not to bring into discussion laws actually in force and which the Haitian Government is obliged to execute. I shall take, however, the liberty to remark that the measures of exclusion enacted in the United States and in Cuba especially with regard to the Chinese do not only treat, as your excellency maintains, of the regulation of the conditions of admission of the new arrivals; for the Chinese who are already found on the territory of these two countries can be expelled without considering whether or not the forced departure will prejudice their interests or the interests of third parties. These laws of exclusion have especially for their purpose, as I have previously shown, the protection of nationals against competition deemed prejudicial. The Republic of Haiti, therefore, does nothing contrary to international usage when, in its turn, it strives to safeguard the interests of its citizens. Therefore, it can only be surprised at the menace which is made it to give the greatest publicity to the fact that the liberty and security of commerce has received a serious blow. Strong in its right, the Republic of Haiti will leave such an accusation to the appreciation of all those who have made fortunes in it, as also all those who continue to do a lucrative business therein under a protection which it has never spared.

[Page 541]

I wish, consequently, to believe that this will end in the recognition of the good intentions with which it is animated and I take this occasion to renew to you [etc.].

J. N. Léger.
  1. Should be 26.