760C.61/7–2044

Memorandum by the Director of the Office of European Affairs (Dunn) to the Secretary of State

Mr. Secretary: The Red Army having crossed the Curzon Line,45 it is possible that new developments in the Polish-Soviet dispute will arise at any time.

There is attached for your consideration a memorandum outlining the latest developments and suggesting the policy which it is believed we should follow in the event of unilateral Soviet action in this matter.

James Clement Dunn
[Page 1297]
[Annex]

Recommendations as to Policy in the Event of the Expected Developments in the Soviet-Polish Dispute

From the failure of the secret conversations which Prime Minister Mikolajczyk has been having with the Soviet Ambassador to the Czechoslovak Government in London, and Stalin’s reply to the President discouraging a visit by Mikolajczyk to Moscow, it is clear that there is virtually no hope of any resumption of diplomatic relations between the Polish Government-in-exile and the Soviet Government. The last Soviet conditions conveyed to Mikolajczyk amounted not to a demand for the reorganization of the Polish Government-in-exile but for its dissolution and the formation of an entirely new Government; it is also clear from Stalin’s statement to Professor Lange46 when he was in Moscow, that the Soviet Government does not intend to set up a Soviet military administration in the liberated areas of Poland proper.

Under the circumstances, with the Soviet armies beginning to enter Poland, the most likely alternative, and all our information tends to bear this out, would be for the Soviet Government to deal with and possibly recognize some rival Polish organization as the provisional representative of the Polish people. This rival organization would probably be the “National Council of Poland” whose representatives recently visited Moscow. This Council has already been referred to in the Soviet-controlled Polish press in Moscow as the provisional government of Poland. Should this probable development take place, and it may occur in the very near future, the situation which the British and ourselves have sought to avoid will be created. The British and the United States Governments would be dealing with and recognizing as the only legal representative of Poland the present Polish Government-in-exile in London while the Soviet Union would be dealing with and supporting, if not openly recognizing, a rival organization. This split between British-American policy on one hand and Soviet policy on the other in regard to Poland would be complete. The obvious danger of civil war is very real, with one side (and probably the losing one) fighting with at least moral support from the United States and Great Britain, while the other was being actively supported by the Soviet Union. Furthermore, there is no doubt that the recognition by the Soviet Government of a rival Polish organization would impose a severe strain on the unity of the Allies since throughout the world such a rival government or organization would be regarded as a Soviet puppet whether or not this was strictly true.

[Page 1298]

In considering the best, or rather the least undesirable, policy for this government to follow in the face of some such development, it must be borne in mind that there is very great doubt as to the degree of real support which a rival Polish organization would have inside Poland. It is virtually certain that the entire weight of the Soviet propaganda machine, both from Moscow and sympathetic sources abroad, will be brought to bear to convince the world that the new organization represents the “real democratic forces” inside Poland and as such is entitled to be considered in international affairs as the legal de facto government. It is felt, however, that before this government considers any revision of its present attitude of recognizing and dealing only with the Polish Government in London, substantial proof must be forthcoming either through reports of American observers in Poland or by means of a genuine election that the new organization commands the support of the majority of the Polish people. Therefore, during the war until this question can be clarified, we should abstain from any act or word which would further the propaganda attempts to depict such organization as the genuine representative of the Polish people.

On questions involving relief and other practical matters, this principle should in general be followed, but for humanitarian reasons, it might be possible to examine each case on its merits. In short, the only possible policy for the United States Government is to watch closely the developments in Poland and avoid being stampeded by any propaganda campaign into the support of claims which subsequent events might reveal to be unfounded. We should, on the other hand, avoid any positive statement which would bind us irrevocably to the permanent support of the Polish Government-in-exile per se.

  1. Rapid inroads into Polish territory occurred in offensives undertaken by the Soviet armies early in July. Vilna was captured on July 13, and Lublin on July 23.
  2. See memorandum by the Assistant Chief of the Division of Eastern Europeans Affairs, June 28, p. 1418.